If TiVo return to the UK would you buy one and be happy to pay for an EPG.

1356716

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,819
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    If the MCE PC has a Radeon graphics card, you can run RGB output from the VGa socket - I do, and the pic quality is top notch.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 5,751
    Forum Member
    that's output from the gfx card.. i was talking about the input from Sky \ NTL \ telewest into the TC card you are using.. i've already got cable so MCE with a free view card and paying for that is no good to me
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,819
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ah, I see. MCE is only a sensible solution for Freeview IMHO.
  • Alex OughtonAlex Oughton Posts: 6,739
    Forum Member
    Yes, and it's because MCE has a free guide which I use all the time that I voted no to paying for a guide.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 5,751
    Forum Member
    true i still use the MCE guide even though i haven't got my MCE machine connected to the TV
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I have so far come to the conclusion that the probelm with using a windows based computer is that is doesn't have the stability required for a consumer electronics device nor does it have the simple (SCART) conections to make it into a plug and play device.

    For example one of my version 1 TiVos ran for a year without rebooting or having any problems - at the end of that time it only rebooted after a long power outage.

    Of course maybe some manufacturer will create a computer with the right inputs and outputs to make connecting it to your home theatre easy - though I have to admit when I have conencted my widescreen PC to a 50" plasma the picture quality has not been as good as feeding the screen with a RGB image from a regular DVD player.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 97
    Forum Member
    Hi!

    Well I worked in the US for 4 years, and I had a Series 2 TiVO. The features and functions above and beyond a series one unit make the system very very much more flexible - heck just being able to put programs into folders makes it 20 times more easy to use!

    I had the home media option too, streaming MPS3, and photos to my TV was a great addition!

    However I'm back in the UK now, and I've waded through ALL the possibilities, freeview, sky, integrated PVR's and SKY+...

    I've ended up with a Thompson Series 1 TiVO, with 600GB of Harddrive space - I have set up a nearly uncompressed recording mode on the system (DVD quality) and am extremely happy with the system.

    This is hooked up on my home network (so I can get the programs off the HD and stream them from my server to other PC's) - this is controlling a PACE SKY box and whilst not a perfect solution, it certainly a million miles away from the clumsy and clunky SKY + or freeview EPG and PVR solutions.

    sTeVE
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,819
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ALanJ wrote:
    Of course maybe some manufacturer will create a computer with the right inputs and outputs to make connecting it to your home theatre easy - though I have to admit when I have conencted my widescreen PC to a 50" plasma the picture quality has not been as good as feeding the screen with a RGB image from a regular DVD player.

    HDMI/DVI are the end of SCART, and the start of easy PC connectivity.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    sanderton wrote:
    HDMI/DVI are the end of SCART, and the start of easy PC connectivity.
    They are but we are still a few years away from the time that HDMI (as it includes audio so is more comparable to SCART) are universally available. Today a HDMI input into a PC would not be overly useful for the above purposes as there are no Sky boxes with this type of output.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 467
    Forum Member
    ALanJ wrote:
    They are but we are still a few years away from the time that HDMI (as it includes audio so is more comparable to SCART) are universally available. Today a HDMI input into a PC would not be overly useful for the above purposes as there are no Sky boxes with this type of output.

    Wait untill the autumn when Sky release HD, I think you will find that the only way of getting HD will be through HDMI
  • DX30DX30 Posts: 899
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    JonMace wrote:
    Wait untill the autumn when Sky release HD, I think you will find that the only way of getting HD will be through HDMI

    From Sky's early statements on the matter I thought they were going HDMI only but if I undestand Sky's latest position correctly then their new stb's will have both HDMI and component output.

    On Sky's own channels HD will be output on both, but broadcasters will have the option of restricting HD to HDMI only.

    I suspect we will need to wait for launch before we know for sure what is happening, and even then I suppose Sky always has the option of going HDMI only whenever they wish.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,819
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    We know for sure. The new box will have component out and it will be enabled for HD output on all Sky's HD channels. This has been officially stated time after time. I have personally been told it byt Sky's HD product manager, as has AlanJ.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    JonMace wrote:
    Wait until the autumn when Sky release HD, I think you will find that the only way of getting HD will be through HDMI

    But that was not the discussion was about. HDMI as a method of carriage is still in its infancy :) We were talking about why a PC manufacturer has not created the equivalent of a SCART input / Scart Output board with appropriate encoding and decoding software to take RGB input and output RGB for European TVs (and there we probably have the answer it is a non-US phenomenon).

    As others have said Sky have confirmed and I have personally spoken to the head of Sky's HD marketing and he stated that the first generation HD box will have analogue HD component outputs and ALL Sky's programming would be available in HD on the analogue HD outputs (he can not control non Sky channels). This will include all of their sport and movie channels that are available in HD.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    what the hell is Tivo? iv heard of it on sex and the city that it is
  • gomezzgomezz Posts: 44,507
    Forum Member
    scouse_j wrote:
    what the hell is Tivo? iv heard of it on sex and the city that it is
    What the hell is Google? I have heard people talking about that too. :rolleyes:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I was recently reading the manual for a US DVD Recorder and realised why HDMI has so much potential in the US there is no simple single cable solution for hooking up TVs / Monitors to Home Theatre componets (DVD / VCR / Satellite box / TiVo etc).

    Now to be a useful input it must become the defacto input standard for displays once it does then hopefully the output will follow. The problems I have with it are that I suspect (but don't know) that HDMI (which might be viewed as DVI with sound - it isn't but it is a good simplistic aproach) is a single wire digital connection.

    This is fine for flat pannel based devices that are digital but will it work as well with CRT based technology or will you need more electronics in the CRT box to make it work adding to the cost?

    Equally we have now started to see HDMI apear on very high end DVD players that include upscaling technology to mathc the output device but it will be some time before HDMI spreads down to cheaper DVD / DVR / PVR type devices.

    It will happen but it will take time.

    ALan

    PS TiVo is a hard disk based Personal Video Recorder with intergrated EPG and sopisticated programming technology see www.tivo.com for more details.
  • SystemSystem Posts: 2,096,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    That really is the key to a good EPG it is not the base data it is the ability to follow shows over their entire season and to be able to tell the difference between new shows and repeats.

    TiVo's greatness is not just the software it is the combination of clever software with an EPG that provides extensive programme and episode information to allow all this to happen.

    One selection allows the recording of a whole series. Is that worht the money - probably.

    This post really does hit the nail on the head.

    In order for a PVR to be genuinely useful it needs to have a sophisticated series-recording option, namely:

    1) It needs to be able to record each episode of a series
    2) It needs to be capable of distinguishing between new shows and repeats
    3) If there are other series-recording requests queued, it should if possible have the intelligence to allow recording of both programmes if repeats of the same episode are available, so all programmed get recorded
    4) Most importantly, it needs to be able to remember these programmes so you catch the first episode of a new series without having to remember that a new series is coming.

    If a system does not have all these, then it's little better than a system that demands you record each programme manually.

    *Only* TiVo has all of these. Sky+ has the first two, but frequently "forgets" a series because the programme isn't in the schedules for a week or two, ot it clashes with something else, or simply because the programme provider decides to change the parameters such that Sky+ doesn't recognise the next episode. Result -- entire series lost potentially.

    I have both Sky+ and TiVo, and the only reason I keep Sky+ on is because it is effectively free. TiVo on the other hand would present a major problem to my viewing habits now if it disappeared.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 5,528
    Forum Member
    I guess I've never lived (never seen a Tivo) but is manually setting timers to record a TV series really THAT difficult that it needs £200 worth of technology to do it for you?

    Cliff
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 128
    Forum Member
    I love the season pass in Tivo. The few times its remembered that a new series is starting that I hadn't remembered is worth its weight in gold.

    Also the way you can keep just the latest recording is great for childrens programs. I can record lots of programs off CBeebies or NickJr, but they only take a limited amount of space on the HDD and screen. Dont' think SKy+ can do that.


    Although when Sky HD launches, I'll probably have that (I guess Sky+HD is default), and have the Tivo on the spare Sky box.
  • SystemSystem Posts: 2,096,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    CJL wrote:
    I guess I've never lived (never seen a Tivo) but is manually setting timers to record a TV series really THAT difficult that it needs £200 worth of technology to do it for you?

    Cliff

    But with what you say being the case, why have a Sky+ either?

    Having a system that claims to be able to record every episode of a series, but lacks the functionality to do the job properly I find is actually worse than having a dumb VCR that needs manual programming because when the machine does things for you you don't expect it to forget half-way through the series.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CJL wrote:
    I guess I've never lived (never seen a Tivo) but is manually setting timers to record a TV series really THAT difficult that it needs £200 worth of technology to do it for you?

    Cliff

    For some people very hard :)

    More seriously a product like TiVo deals with the changes that frequently happen when programmes get moved from their regular slot. OK if you time shift them by a day but not so useful if you don't watch one eposode until after the next one has broadcast only to find that your recording is useless and yiu have an hour of (football / darts / dancing etc) becuase the programme you want to watch has been shifted in the schedules.

    TiVo isn't clever enough to deal with real time changes to the programmes but even though Sky+ can be a bit dodgey :) and is dependent on the broadcaster doing the right thing with their EPG data.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,819
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CJL wrote:
    I guess I've never lived (never seen a Tivo) but is manually setting timers to record a TV series really THAT difficult that it needs £200 worth of technology to do it for you?

    Cliff

    Difficult, no. Time consuming and tedious, yes. ALL my TV watching is timeshifted. If I were to set that lot up manually it would take hours a week. I value my time far higher than the cost of a TiVo.
  • SystemSystem Posts: 2,096,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    sanderton, out of interest I see you have MS Media Center there. Is this system's EPG system comparable to TiVo's? It's the one system I've never really looked into, but it should be very sophisticated.
  • DX30DX30 Posts: 899
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CJL wrote:
    I guess I've never lived (never seen a Tivo) but is manually setting timers to record a TV series really THAT difficult that it needs £200 worth of technology to do it for you?

    Cliff

    It's a bit like explaining why a PVR is better than a VCR. Both just record TV programs - is changing a video tape really that much of a hassle?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,008
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    DX30 wrote:
    It's a bit like explaining why a DVR is better than a VCR. Both just record TV programs - is changing a video tape really that much of a hassle?

    Actually it is a much harder thing to do :)
Sign In or Register to comment.