Options
The Vile Creature That Is Jonathan King
![[Deleted User]](https://w3.vanillicon.com/v2/34beceb7ce08bedf5f823db42b603198.svg)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 950 Forum Member
✭✭
This man was released early from prison yesterday after serving less than half a seven year sentance for abusing boys :mad:. He then made a very cocky statment to the press saying how handsome he was and that the boys he abused enjoyed their time with him 
:mad: I cannot believe this guy believes he has done no wrong and shows absolutley no remorse to the boys he abused. It is a very sad, strange world where paedophiles, like JK, are allowed to walk the streets after serving a paltry sentance when his victims have a life sentence trying to cope with what was been done to them. What are your views on this man?
:mad: I cannot believe this guy believes he has done no wrong and shows absolutley no remorse to the boys he abused. It is a very sad, strange world where paedophiles, like JK, are allowed to walk the streets after serving a paltry sentance when his victims have a life sentence trying to cope with what was been done to them. What are your views on this man? 0
Comments
mystique72, where did you see that story??
Its always been like that - part of his stunning good looks.......................................NOT
It was said on the News last night. I definately heard it right because myself and my husband couldnt believe what we were hearing and commented on it.
What I cannot believe is the naivety of some of the journalists reporting his remarks as if they prove anything other than he is one of the vast majority for whom prison has done nothing to make him address his behaviour.
Check here for some of his comments.
I can only agree with Pretty Polly. His comments only serve to make me even more convinced of his guilt. Paedophiles commonly believe the children they abuse are 'asking for it' and are willing partners.
The only way to deal with people like this is to lock them away for good. Their sexual preference is children. No amount of rehabilitation is going to change that. As such, they are not safe to be in the public domain due to the innocent lives they ruin. Jonathan King is clearly one such person.
I have just said the exact same thing on another thread. Apparently he is being interviewed by his 'old friend' James Whale tonight on the radio.
Surely it makes a mockery of the justice system that someone who shows no remorse and states that the boys were consenting partners, is allowed to serve half a sentence and then come out and use what they have done as self publicity and make money from it, effectively laughing in his victims faces. And on top of that, no doubt the tax payer is picking up the bill for the police who are having to stand outside his house and 'protect' him from vigilantes.
He is vile in every way. A waste of human space. I just hope that those in the entertainment business ignore his existence and he disappears back under the rock he crawled out of. Someone should knock that smug, egocentric, wonky smile right off that dirty pervert's face. :mad:
He does however make interesting comments such as
"Outside prison, King plugged his My Love, My Life CD with a shameless written flyer advising against buying it "if you don't play Elvis Presley because he slept with a 14-year-old girl or The Rolling Stones because one of them deflowered a 13-year-old girl..."
or
"As Oscar Wilde said when he was released from prison 100 years ago for crimes which were similar, 'On to the next adventure'."
Let us all hope that King's next adventure does not involve another child.
Even if not guilty of child abuse, he should be locked up for crimes against music. Oscar Wilde he is not.
From Minette Walters' book 'Disordered Minds':
"It is a cornerstone of the UK penal system that remorse is a precondition for parole......"
Dunno about you lot but I saw little or no remorse whatsoever coming from him during his press interviews...
....... :rolleyes:
All that matters is conduct during his stay in gaol, and the risk of doing it again.
And as for his statement about an appeal court overturning his conviction , he made it sound as though he would be proved innocent. Well from what I have read , I may have misunderstood but I don't think so , but the appeal is on the grounds of technicalities in the bringing of the original case and nothing to do with evidence , so if thats what he calls being innocent then the man is not only seriously deluded but just as stupid as he is ugly !
I never knew another King (of Rock and Pop) slept with a 14 year old girl. Who was she?