Its good to see that no matter what Rishi Sunak does public opinion is very much against him now. These cruel and callous policies used to be vote winners for the nasty party but thankfully the public are finally done with these corrupt and incompetent liars.
Sunak could discover a cure for cancer and it still wouldn’t save him,people have just had enough of almost 14 years of a Tory government ,right now the Government is basically a dead man walking.
If he did discover a cure for cancer, he would make sure it was so expensive that only his greedy, cruel, rich and bigoted mates could afford it.
I have no truck with Sunak and the Tories and want to see them gone as soon as possible, but I think that is beyond unfair. A daft comment in fact.
Its good to see that no matter what Rishi Sunak does public opinion is very much against him now. These cruel and callous policies used to be vote winners for the nasty party but thankfully the public are finally done with these corrupt and incompetent liars.
Sunak could discover a cure for cancer and it still wouldn’t save him,people have just had enough of almost 14 years of a Tory government ,right now the Government is basically a dead man walking.
If he did discover a cure for cancer, he would make sure it was so expensive that only his greedy, cruel, rich and bigoted mates could afford it.
I have no truck with Sunak and the Tories and want to see them gone as soon as possible, but I think that is beyond unfair. A daft comment in fact.
It was a bit over the top but it does reflect that many people - myself included - see Sunak and the Tories as the most self serving and corrupt government in my lifetime. I blame Johnson for this - he set the tone and showed people that if you lie through your teeth lost of people will believe you. That man did more damage to this country than almost anyone ever - arguably more than Thatcher (and I struggle to say her name without growling)
Someone needed to draw him a diagram. He was very confused.
He really wasn’t!
He was certainly confused by the question - you can't deny that.
When asked specifically what would happen to refugees coming form Congo, which is "warring" with its neighbour Rwanda, he answered by saying people from Rwanda would not be sent back to Rwanda.
That Victor loves the sound of his own voice dosent he. The audience seem to be lapping him up but I find him a pretentious pr**k and is not the sort of person I would get along with. And shave off that crappy white beard thing ffs it looks ridiculous .
He did waffle on a bit but most of what he said was spot on
Notice the lack of applause Johnson’s mate “Lord” Moore got for his answer to the Rwanda plan question,I don’t think it’s going to be much of a vote winner for the Tories come election time.
Government supporters never get applause on the prgramme even though the audience is not biased.
Notice the lack of applause Johnson’s mate “Lord” Moore got for his answer to the Rwanda plan question,I don’t think it’s going to be much of a vote winner for the Tories come election time.
Government supporters never get applause on the prgramme even though the audience is not biased.
Can I ask you to be clear on this - are you suggesting the selection of the QT audience is generally biased against the Government?
I ask because nearly every week I see claims on here that the audience is always biased in favour of the Government. It obviously can't be both...
The Conservative and Unionist Party is only interested in The Conservative and Unionist Party and screwing as much money out of this country for there friends and families before they are kicked out off office.
It's always the poor, sick and disabled that are ruining the country or immigrants and single mothers, It's never the tax avoiders and evaders or the private sector who squeeze as much money out of our public services they have been brought in to "run more effectively" before handing them back on the brink of collapse.
While the tax payer is left with the bill these companies are allowed to walk away scot-free.
Imo the only reason that this Rwanda bill has not been killed is because someone connected to the Tories somewhere must be making a lot of money out of it, I don't see any other reason to continue with it.
Someone needed to draw him a diagram. He was very confused.
He really wasn’t!
Oh My! you sound just like what a mother would say about their son.
He knew they were different countries - but unlikely he knew whether a Congo refugee would be returned to Rwanda or whether a Rwanda refugee themselves would be returned to Rwanda.
Someone needed to draw him a diagram. He was very confused.
He really wasn’t!
Oh My! you sound just like what a mother would say about their son.
He knew they were different countries - but unlikely he knew whether a Congo refugee would be returned to Rwanda or whether a Rwanda refugee themselves would be returned to Rwanda.
Really! you sound just like what a Grandmother would say about their Grandson.
Someone needed to draw him a diagram. He was very confused.
He really wasn’t!
He was certainly confused by the question - you can't deny that.
When asked specifically what would happen to refugees coming form Congo, which is "warring" with its neighbour Rwanda, he answered by saying people from Rwanda would not be sent back to Rwanda.
Notice the lack of applause Johnson’s mate “Lord” Moore got for his answer to the Rwanda plan question,I don’t think it’s going to be much of a vote winner for the Tories come election time.
I used to think that people in power in financial comfort and lots of time would be the best to forward social progress
As opposed to people worrying 365 about bills and all sorts
Not so apparently
Can they not even get the facts straight in their head
Legal immigration is too high 660 million
Err you invited half of the over and gave visas to the other half so etf u complaining for which gives you a excuse to bash I,legal so called immigrants / refugees
Use your brains
Give them jobs ..the country needs them …nhs staff, carers , construction to build HOMES this country is crying out for and all sorts
Instead they give the money to private companies to house them costing an arm and a leg 150 per person per night and NO z they’re not staying at the ritz as some say
Are there actually any good tory MPs?
I ask because why would anyone with one iota of integrity and a set of decent moral standards want to belong to a party with so many corrupt, greedy, downright spiteful, lying scumbags?
Sir Charles Walker is pure class; I am struggling to think of any others, because Bozo The Clown got rid of most of the decent ones in 2019.
Spoiler alert…. No one was a fan of the PMs “sick note” policy in the audience today. They devoted almost the first half hour to the topic
Don’t fret Philp said there will be specially trained personnel aka better than doctors to decide if someone can get a sick note
Rings a bell
Oh you can stand? For 4 mins? That’s ok you can stand all day
Disgusting
I’m all for rooting out the benefit cheats but I bet you 95% or more just can’t work and for a whole lot of them thr govt is responsible with some of their policies and also lack of policies or meagre policies
The Conservative and Unionist Party is only interested in The Conservative and Unionist Party and screwing as much money out of this country for there friends and families before they are kicked out off office.
It's always the poor, sick and disabled that are ruining the country or immigrants and single mothers, It's never the tax avoiders and evaders or the private sector who squeeze as much money out of our public services they have been brought in to "run more effectively" before handing them back on the brink of collapse.
While the tax payer is left with the bill these companies are allowed to walk away scot-free.
Imo the only reason that this Rwanda bill has not been killed is because someone connected to the Tories somewhere must be making a lot of money out of it, I don't see any other reason to continue with it.
You got thatcher to thank for most of that
Single mothers if any would need extra help but no thatcher penalised them back then
She had a nasty streak albeit a fair logical enough sounding person at times
60 is the new 40
Especially if you have a good life
I think I might look a bit better and younger if I was on 400 grand a year and 10 grand a pop for an after dinner speech!
That might just relieve a few worry lines at least!
Someone needed to draw him a diagram. He was very confused.
He really wasn’t!
Oh My! you sound just like what a mother would say about their son.
He knew they were different countries - but unlikely he knew whether a Congo refugee would be returned to Rwanda or whether a Rwanda refugee themselves would be returned to Rwanda.
Comments
I have no truck with Sunak and the Tories and want to see them gone as soon as possible, but I think that is beyond unfair. A daft comment in fact.
It was a bit over the top but it does reflect that many people - myself included - see Sunak and the Tories as the most self serving and corrupt government in my lifetime. I blame Johnson for this - he set the tone and showed people that if you lie through your teeth lost of people will believe you. That man did more damage to this country than almost anyone ever - arguably more than Thatcher (and I struggle to say her name without growling)
No, what’s embarrassing is the number of people failing to understand that he DID know , and wasn’t asking because he didn’t know!
He really wasn’t!
He was certainly confused by the question - you can't deny that.
When asked specifically what would happen to refugees coming form Congo, which is "warring" with its neighbour Rwanda, he answered by saying people from Rwanda would not be sent back to Rwanda.
You what? 🤔
He did waffle on a bit but most of what he said was spot on
Government supporters never get applause on the prgramme even though the audience is not biased.
Can I ask you to be clear on this - are you suggesting the selection of the QT audience is generally biased against the Government?
I ask because nearly every week I see claims on here that the audience is always biased in favour of the Government. It obviously can't be both...
Oh My! you sound just like what a mother would say about their son.
It's always the poor, sick and disabled that are ruining the country or immigrants and single mothers, It's never the tax avoiders and evaders or the private sector who squeeze as much money out of our public services they have been brought in to "run more effectively" before handing them back on the brink of collapse.
While the tax payer is left with the bill these companies are allowed to walk away scot-free.
Imo the only reason that this Rwanda bill has not been killed is because someone connected to the Tories somewhere must be making a lot of money out of it, I don't see any other reason to continue with it.
He knew they were different countries - but unlikely he knew whether a Congo refugee would be returned to Rwanda or whether a Rwanda refugee themselves would be returned to Rwanda.
Really! you sound just like what a Grandmother would say about their Grandson.
I was confused by the question also!
Looks damn good for 60.
Govt yes man - not an original utterance ever - that’s how you keep your job I suppose
I used to think that people in power in financial comfort and lots of time would be the best to forward social progress
As opposed to people worrying 365 about bills and all sorts
Not so apparently
Can they not even get the facts straight in their head
Legal immigration is too high 660 million
Err you invited half of the over and gave visas to the other half so etf u complaining for which gives you a excuse to bash I,legal so called immigrants / refugees
Use your brains
Give them jobs ..the country needs them …nhs staff, carers , construction to build HOMES this country is crying out for and all sorts
Instead they give the money to private companies to house them costing an arm and a leg 150 per person per night and NO z they’re not staying at the ritz as some say
Rings a bell
Oh you can stand? For 4 mins? That’s ok you can stand all day
Disgusting
I’m all for rooting out the benefit cheats but I bet you 95% or more just can’t work and for a whole lot of them thr govt is responsible with some of their policies and also lack of policies or meagre policies
You got thatcher to thank for most of that
Single mothers if any would need extra help but no thatcher penalised them back then
She had a nasty streak albeit a fair logical enough sounding person at times
She most certainly does.
Especially if you have a good life
I think I might look a bit better and younger if I was on 400 grand a year and 10 grand a pop for an after dinner speech!
That might just relieve a few worry lines at least!
No he didn't. He actually asked if they were.
He was utterly baffled by it.
And it was not a complex question.